Skip to content

Feature upgrade docs #2

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Feature upgrade docs #2

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

mcgin314
Copy link
Contributor

Upgraded all components, took a stab at documentation in the README, think this is in alignment with structure we want and created a simple example for local testing.

Comment on lines +1 to +20
provider "aws" {
profile = local.profile
region = local.region
}

provider "helm" {
kubernetes {
host = data.aws_eks_cluster.cluster.endpoint

cluster_ca_certificate = base64decode(data.aws_eks_cluster.cluster.certificate_authority[0].data)
token = data.aws_eks_cluster_auth.cluster.token
}
}

provider "kubernetes" {
host = data.aws_eks_cluster.cluster.endpoint

cluster_ca_certificate = base64decode(data.aws_eks_cluster.cluster.certificate_authority[0].data)
token = data.aws_eks_cluster_auth.cluster.token
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we are writing the sample for TG, then we should use provider generate in the terragrunt.hcl?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't really imagine ever trying the sample with Terragrunt. What I've been doing is testing each module just in pure Terraform with one of these examples and cover Terragrunt in another pass. I could be adding an additional step, but in my head I've wanted to be certain everything is right with the module in TF before introducing TG. If you think it's extra work, could save ourselves some time by skipping.

Comment on lines +31 to +35
region = "us-gov-east-1"
profile = "terraform"
cluster_name = "platform-test-1"
namespace = "prometheus"
create_namespace = "true"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bad juju

Copy link
Contributor

@morga471 morga471 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comments, no changes required, just things to think about.

Copy link
Contributor

@nangu001 nangu001 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see chart versions are updated, hope they have been tested out.

@nangu001 nangu001 merged commit 904bcd6 into main Jul 23, 2024
@nangu001 nangu001 deleted the feature-upgrade-docs branch July 23, 2024 19:11
Sign in to join this conversation on GitHub.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants